Key Thought: The religious leaders came to confront, confound, and defeat Jesus, but they never succeeded. We need to consider what Christians can do to break through prejudice and speak to those resisting God’s call.
August 31, 2024

1. Have a volunteer read Mark 11:12-26

1. Ask class members to share a short thought on what the most important point is in this passage.
2. What importance of the events is depicted here?
3. Personal Application: Why is humility so important for Christians?
   Share your thoughts.
4. Case Study: One of your relatives states, “How are we supposed to be proud of being Christian without being accused of being judgmental, superior, or self-righteous? How would you respond to your relative?

2. Have a volunteer read Mark 11:27-33

1. Ask class members to share a thought on what the most important point in this text is.
2. What is the importance of the events depicted here
3. Personal Application: What things in your life do you need Jesus to purify? How does this happen? Share your thoughts.
4. Case Study: One of your friends states, “How did Jesus follow up His refusal to answer, and what effect did it have? Why did Jesus speak in parables here?” How would you respond to your friend?

3. Have a volunteer read Mark 12:13-27

1. Ask class members to share a short thought on what the most important point in this text is.
2. What challenge did the religious leaders bring to Jesus and how did He respond?
3. Personal Application: If someone asked you, “Do you know the power of God?” How would you answer? Share your thoughts.
4. Case Study: One of your neighbors states: “The Bible is just people’s own ideas about God, who He is, and how He operates. You can make the Bible say anything you want it to.” How would you respond to your neighbor?

4. Have a volunteer read Mark 12:28-34

1. Ask class members to share a thought on what the most important point in this text is.
2. What question did the scribe ask and what double response did Jesus give?
3. Personal Application: How do we learn to love God and our neighbors as ourselves? How is the cross the key to following these commands? Share your thoughts.
4. Case Study: Think of one person who needs to hear a message from this week’s lesson. Tell the class what you plan to do this week to share with them.

(Truth that is not lived, that is not imparted, loses its life-giving power, its healing virtue. Its blessings can be retained only as it is shared.”Ministry of Healing, p. 148).

(1)

Source: https://ssnet.org/blog/9-jerusalem-controversies-teaching-plan/

Daily Lesson for Wednesday 28th of August 2024

The religious leaders were trying to catch Jesus in something they could use to condemn Him, either to the Roman governor or to the people. In this controversy, it was the question of paying taxes. In this time and place, refusing to pay taxes could be taken as rebellion against the Roman government, a serious offense.

Image © Review & Herald Publishing at Goodsalt.com

Jesus’ reply to give to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s and to God the things that are God’s kept Him out of a trap and also provided profound instruction on the believer’s responsibility to the government. “He declared that since they were living under the protection of the Roman power, they should render to that power the support it claimed, so long as this did not conflict with a higher duty. But while peaceably subject to the laws of the land, they should at all times give their first allegiance to God.”—Ellen. G. White, The Desire of Ages, p. 602.

What follows next is a question about the resurrection of the dead. The Sadducees were a priestly group that accepted only the five books of Moses as Scripture. They did not believe in the resurrection of the dead. The scenario they present to Jesus was probably hypothetical. It involved seven brothers and one woman. According to the law of Moses, when a man who died left no sons, his brother would marry the widow to maintain property in a family line, and any children born to that union would be legally those of the dead man (Deuteronomy 25:5-10).

Seeking to discredit the doctrine of the resurrection, the Sadducees point to a moral dilemma of whose wife the woman would be in the resurrection. Jesus counters their argument in two steps, referring to the Scriptures and to the power of God. First, He describes the power of God in the resurrection and indicates that there will not be marriage in heaven. Then He defends the doctrine of the resurrection by appealing to Exodus 3:1-22, where God indicates that He is the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. Jesus implies that this means that they will be raised; they cannot remain dead if God is the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, who are, for now, dead.

(1)

Source: https://ssnet.org/blog/24c-09-earthly-duties-and-heavenly-outcomes/

So Jesus answered and said to him, “What do you want Me to do for you?…” Mark 10:51 NKJV

While we were studying last week’s Sabbath School lesson in class, a friend told an interesting and disturbing story. She said several years ago her stepfather was in the hospital. A “sunshine band” from her local Adventist church came into his room and told him they would sing for him. He told them he was glad to visit but did not wish to be sung to. The sunshine band simply would not take no for an answer. They knew this man needed to be sung to regardless of what he thought or said. So they proceeded to sing around his bed, so sure this would cheer him up. He got so frustrated he tried to get up from bed and leave! Joyful members of the sunshine band pinned him down as the others joyfully sang, convincing themselves this was just what the patient needed, despite his vocal and physical protests.

This did absolutely nothing to endear this man to the church or to God, but the sunshine band members walked out of his hospital room patting themselves on the back for faithfully completing their mission. 

It was after my friend’s testimony in class that we read Mark 10:46-52. After the passage was read, another friend said, “Notice Jesus asked the man what he wanted Jesus to do for him.” After our friend’s story about her stepfather this observation was huge. We talked about how often a church will choose a “cookie cutter” form of evangelism for their community instead of finding out exactly what their own community wants or actually needs.

We may want to do a Revelation Seminar, but what if the community needs a divorce recovery workshop instead? I know Revelation is important. You don’t have to tell me. I have been teaching and preaching Revelation for years. But when we have a Revelation seminar which no one comes to, can we really say we did our best and its the community’s fault no one showed up? After all, no one got on the ark with Noah and his family, right? All we can do is preach and if no one comes to hear that’s their fault, right? 

Well, did we even ask the community what they wanted, like Jesus asked the man in Mark 10:46-52 what he wanted? If we do a survey in the community and the majority ask for a divorce recovery workshop, and no one  asks for a Revelation seminar, it makes more sense to do the divorce recovery workshop, because people will actually show up, and after all, the Bible not only teaches us about last day events. The Bible also teaches us that “we should live soberly, righteously, and godly in the present age.” Titus 2:12 NKJV

While prophecy is important, people also need to learn how to live like Jesus in everyday life. There is more to righteous and godly living than just knowing about last-day events. We need to be interested in the community’s day-to-day lives and needs. 

Then again, maybe your community is asking for Revelation seminars. The point is, Jesus did not tell the man in Mark 10:46-52 what he needed. He asked him what he wanted. As my Sabbath School class discussed last week, we need to follow Jesus’ example of asking people what they want instead of being like the “sunshine band,” that pinned a man down in his bed making him take what they thought he needed. 

(0)

Source: https://ssnet.org/blog/meeting-the-needs-of-our-community/

Daily Lesson for Tuesday 27th of August 2024

The day after Jesus cleanses the temple, the religious leaders confront Him in the temple courts, asking by what authority He acted the day before. They are not seeking truth but seeking to trap Him. If He says that His authority is from God, they will deny that a simple country carpenter could have such authority. If He admits that His authority is human, they will dismiss Him as a fool.

But Jesus sees through their trap and says He will answer their question if they will answer one He asks. What He asks is whether John the Baptist’s baptism was from God or from men. Instantly, the leaders see that they are the ones trapped. If they say from God, Jesus will say, “Why did you not believe him?” If they say from men, they fear the people. So, they lie and say they do not know. This gives Jesus the opportunity to refuse to answer their question.

Jesus tells a parable about a vineyard, an owner, and tenants to whom he rents it. The story Jesus tells has great similarities to the parable of the vineyard found in Isaiah 5:1-30, where God brings a charge against unfaithful Israel. Everyone would recognize the parallel, especially the religious leaders.

The story unfolds in a most unusual way as the tenants refuse to give any of the fruits of the field to the owner. Instead, they mistreat and kill his servants. Finally, the owner sends his beloved son, whom he expects them to respect. But not so. They strangely reason that if they kill the son, the vineyard will be theirs. Their illogic is striking, and the judgment to be meted out on them is justified.

In this story, Jesus is giving the religious leaders a solemn warning as to where their steps are heading. Seen in this light, His parable is a loving forewarning. It is not too late for them to change and avoid certain judgment. Some will repent, change, and accept Jesus. Others will not.

(0)

Source: https://ssnet.org/blog/24c-09-who-said-you-could-do-that/

Coming from Bethany towards Jerusalem, Jesus saw a fig tree in full leaf, and approached it, hoping to find some figs. Finding none, He cursed the tree, and by the next day, it had withered and died! (See Mark 11:12-26.) What a strange story this appears to be – a contrast to the loving acts of Jesus throughout the gospels. 

Now let’s take a closer look. First of all, it helps to understand the nature of fig trees grown in the Mediterranean area. Unlike many fig trees grown in areas of the US that experience significant winter crops, most, if not all fig trees grown in areas such as the vicinity of Jerusalem bear a spring crop that grows on last year’s wood and starts developing before the leaves break out.^Note  By the time the tree is in full leaf, it is reasonable to expect ripe figs, and that’s exactly what Jesus expected, even though it was not yet the season for ripe figs, as Mark 11:13 tells us. This tree in full leaf, gave promise of an earlier crop than the rest of the trees that were not yet leafed out. 

pppas0308-JM-305F

But still, why did Jesus curse the fig tree? This is the only instance in the gospels where Jesus actively “cursed” something. But why?

I believe that this was an acted parable in conjunction with his parable of the fig tree found in Mark 13:6-8. In this story parable, we see the owner of a vineyard wanting to cut down an unfruitful fig tree, but he is deterred by the keeper of the vineyard who offers to dig around it and fertilize it, “And if it bears fruit, well. But if not, after that you can cut it down.’ ” (Mark 13:9) The implication is clear – if there is no fruit the following year, the tree will be cut down. 

When we consider the fig tree in full leaf contrasted with the other fig trees not yet leafed out, we can see a picture of the nation of Israel at the time of Christ. They professed to be God’s people, and it was reasonable to expect good “fruit” in their lives – fruit of goodness, righteousness and truth. (cf. Eph. 5:9). By contrast, the other trees did not raise such expectations, because they were not in full leaf – just like the Gentiles did not raise the expectation of demonstrating the fruit of the Spirit of God. God expects fruit in accordance with  our profession and our privilege. (See also Luke 12:47-48)

In this instance of cursing the fig tree, and a number of parables, Jesus made clear that the judgment of God will fall on those professing to be God’s people while they do not demonstrate the fruit of the Spirit in their lives. (See particularly the parable of the sheep and the goats in Matthew 25:31-36.) God is a God of justice as well as mercy. 

The lesson is for us as well. Do we bear the fruit of the Spirit (Galatians 5:22, Ephesians 5:9), or do we only have the appearance of fruit?

Jesus has promised to give His Spirit in full measure to all who ask in sincerity.  (See Luke 11:11- 13) And the Holy Spirit will produce fruit in our lives – the fruit of love, joy, peace, longsuffering, kindness, goodness, righteousness, truth, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control. But we need to ask!

You may also read about this in more detail in The Desire of Ages, page 581  and Christ’s Object Lessons, page 214. 

Note: In the US, we call the spring crop a “breba” crop, and only certain varieties of figs have it. We planted a fig tree that was supposed to bear a breba crop, but that crop is not reliable in our area. Our fig tree is about to be cut down, because we seldom get a few figs in the summer, and the fall crop comes too late. It was when I realized that Jesus was looking for this early crop that the incident of the cursed fig tree started making sense to me.

(0)

Source: https://ssnet.org/blog/why-did-jesus-curse-the-fig-tree/